The phrase "a fixed trial" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to legal proceedings or experiments that are predetermined and not subject to change.
Example: "The defendant was concerned about the implications of a fixed trial on the integrity of the justice system."
Alternatives: "a predetermined trial" or "a set trial".
As she put it, "everyone in the judicial community understands perfectly that this is a rigged case, a fixed trial".
However, in Study 1, we used a fixed trial duration, thus we could not disambiguate between an effect of anticipation time from an effect of reaction time.
3. Generate a fixed trial effect, β0 ~ N 0,0.5), again on the log scale.
So, the assumed incidence used 540 000); a fixed trial cost=£1.4 million; and a variable trial cost=£220.
Compared with a traditional, fixed trial methodology, a well-designed adaptive trial can increase the probability of correctly identifying a truly effective therapy and can hasten the identification of futility, allowing scarce resources to be more rapidly directed towards the next promising target or project [ 111].
Designers of ACTs may do well to consider these seven elements when comparing a proposed ACT to a more traditional fixed trial in the planning process.
Setting (i.e. ) and, the adaptive design is equal to the stratification design (i) in Section 2011, that is a fixed sample trial in the full population, testing both hypothesis and.
We did this because time spent on CFL (given the fixed trial length) is logically not independent from that at the alternative bowl.
The comparison of expected utilities suggests that only for specific scenarios adaptive designs can be more efficient than fixed trial designs.
In Phase 3, the discriminative stimulus was reduced to 5 s and presented 50 times with a fixed inter-trial-interval (ITI) of 30 s; only those responses occurring on the reinforced side during the cue were reinforced (FR1) by a 5 s elevation of the sucrose dipper.
If a fixed-effect trial sequential analysis is of primary interest, then the variance between trials should be zero because the underlying assumption behind the fixed-effect model is that all included trials are estimating the same intervention effect.
