Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
A score of four or fewer correct responses out of the six questions indicated cognitive impairment.
Volunteers made fewer correct responses on a Match-to-Sample memory measure (p < .05) and reaction time (RT) and errors increased on a choice RT test (p < .01) in the cold.
The statement assessing prescription of a strong opioid for severe pain as soon as it is detected had the fewest correct responses (51%%).
Schizophrenia patients showed fewer correct responses compared to healthy controls at both time points.
The results revealed that conversation resulted in slower reactions and fewer correct responses on both attention and Peripheral Detection tasks compared to no conversation, while conversation type (remote/in-person) did not make a significant difference.
Rats with a hippocampal lesion required more days to attain the criterion than the control rats to relearn the pre-operatively acquired place discrimination task, and they had fewer correct responses in the first three sessions with new discriminanda than the control rats.
Type of Encoding affected responses: observed items (mean = .93; SD = .02) led to significantly fewer correct responses compared to enacted ones (mean = .97; SD = .06) (Table 2 and Figure 3, upper panel).
Planned comparisons revealed that, whereas the accuracy did not significantly differ between each orientation in the young group, fewer correct responses were given at 180° compared to the other orientations (all p<0.0001) and at 90°L and 90°M in comparison to 0° (both p<0.005) in the old group.
Statements assessing knowledge/attitude regarding pain management had the fewest correct responses.
Similarly, in the Similarities subtest, the switcher group produced significantly fewer correct responses than the non-switchers.
PSP patients generated the fewest correct anti-saccade responses, and in addition to being different to controls and SD patients, this group also made fewer correct responses compared to FTD patients (P = 0.022).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com