The phrase "a far more sweeping" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is significantly broader or more comprehensive than something else.
Example: "The new policy represents a far more sweeping change than we initially anticipated."
Alternatives: "a much broader" or "a significantly wider".
But the peculiar nature of the Texas law gives the court an opportunity for a far more sweeping judgment.
Mr. Leffler has introduced a far more sweeping bill that would prohibit almost all cell phone use in moving vehicles.
They worry that the administration will be pushed into trying all foreign terrorism suspects in military commissions — a far more sweeping approach than even President Bush advocated.
Mr. Paterson, in his State of the State address last week, proposed a far more sweeping plan that would centralize ethics enforcement in Albany with a single independent commission responsible for enforcing the state's campaign finance and ethics laws.
Staking out a far more sweeping position on the Rockefeller drug laws than either of his opponents in the race for governor, Tom Golisano will call today for the laws' repeal, his campaign aides said.
Although parts of Lincoln Center have been renovated and patched up many times over 40 years, officials saw the need in 1999 for a far more sweeping effort to modernize old halls with the latest technology and correct spatial compromises in the original design.
Bullitt returned with a document far more sweeping even than anything envisioned from the failed Prinkipo plan.
Their comments suggested that Mr. Kean and Mr. Hamilton were willing to work with Mr. Roberts and his allies in the Senate and House to fashion legislation that would accomplish their common goal, an intelligence overhaul far more sweeping than anything that the Bush administration has suggested it would accept.
While the sanctions are not imminent, the list amounts to a sharp warning, covering a range of products far more sweeping than any other retaliatory action proposed in recent memory.
The White House had previously endorsed provisions of a rival Senate bill that would provide a national intelligence director with far more sweeping authority over budgets and personnel of the nation's 15 spy agencies, saying that the House bill would not give the intelligence director "sufficient authorities to manage the intelligence community effectively".
Its core principles were dreamed up in a conservative think tank in the 1990s as a way to counter the far more sweeping health-care plan pushed by President Bill Clinton.
