The phrase "a false sentence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing statements that are not true or are misleading in nature.
Example: "The statement that the Earth is flat is a false sentence that has been debunked by science."
Alternatives: "an untrue statement" or "a misleading assertion".
Moreover, he now identifies the significate of any false sentence with a second mental proposition existing obiective and not subiective in our intellect.
By contrast, (2) is not a logical truth: one could easily hold fixed its logical structure, but vary the meaning of 'bachelor' or 'unmarried' and thereby produce a grammatical but false sentence.
According to the hermeneutic fictionalist a speaker uttering a false moral sentence is typically not expressing a belief in the content expressed by the sentence.
This is just a consequence of the fact that a first-order deduction is a finite sequence, hence a member of H. 9. Take σ to be any logically false sentence!
Every true (false) sentence has the same referent: the True (the False).
Hence, in accordance with the classical substitutivity principle for sentences, we can replace the occurrence of (1) with (2) in the false sentence and the result is the equally false sentence However, when we make the same substitution in the true sentence the result is the sentence which is intuitively false, as John surely could have had a non-mammalian pet.
Although (i) and (ii) are intensionally equivalent, substituting (i) for (ii) and (ii) for (i) in (iii) yields the false sentence 'Socrates exists because {Socrates} exists'.
It is worth noticing that the formal versions of the slingshot show how to move using steps that ultimately preserve reference from any true (false) sentence to any other such sentence.
Thus applying the predicate to something in its positive extension results in a "super-true" sentence, while applying it to something in its negative extension results in a "super-false" sentence.
