The phrase "a false proposition of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing logic, philosophy, or arguments where a statement is being identified as false.
Example: "In the debate, he presented a false proposition of the consequences of the policy change."
Alternatives: "an incorrect assertion of" or "a misleading claim of".
The use of variable functors with liberal substitution enables a number of principles of propositional logic to be given startlingly compressed and elegant formulations, for example the principle of bivalence in the form which can be read as "if something is true of a false proposition then if it true of a true proposition, it is true of any proposition" (C00 is a true proposition).
Let B be a false proposition with a number of worlds tightly clustered around a world z maximally distant from actuality.
A credence of 1 in a false proposition will get a Brier score of 1 the worst score possible.
When we think about something that is false, say, Zermela is a cat, we are not thinking about a false proposition, but rather the objects of our thought are just Zermela and the property of being a cat.
Necessity, in logic and metaphysics, a modal property of a true proposition whereby it is not possible for the proposition to be false and of a false proposition whereby it is not possible for the proposition to be true.
And what is (if anything is) the significate of a false proposition?
If no real proposition matches spoken, written, and mental propositions that are false, what is grasped when we understand the meaning of a false proposition?
One does not necessarily make a step toward the truth by reducing the content of a false proposition.
The notion that an investor has the choice between buying bonds directly in an efficient way and investing in mutual funds is a bit of a false proposition.
However, on his pluralist account of signification it is anodyne, for some of what a false proposition signifies may obtain, other things not — that's why it's false.
