Sentence examples for a factual set from inspiring English sources

Music Web sites like rapdose.com reported on the lyric with headlines that read "Nicki Minaj Endorses Mitt Romney," while the gossip blog Gawker hedged its bets, asking readers, "Did Nicki Minaj Really Endorse Mitt Romney?" However, there were clues in the song that Ms. Minaj was not describing a factual set of circumstances.

Raley, of course, recognized such a due process right in a factual setting involving a great deal more than retroactive application of a judicial ruling limiting prior constitutional precedent.

Paycasso solutions generate a feature rich and factual set of data points that collectively define a level of risk associated with the identity represented in a given transaction.

And what a court does is then look at how those terms apply to a particular factual setting before it.

Green expressly confined the Trono decision to "its peculiar factual setting," namely, an interpretation of a "statutory provision against double jeopardy pertaining to the Philippine Islands". 355 U.S., at 197, 78 S.Ct., at 228; see Price v. Georgia, 398 U.S. 323, 327-328, n. 3, 90 S.Ct.

Although no Ninth Circuit case has applied the defense to prevent enforcement of a copyright infringement claim, the Ninth Circuit suggests that, under the appropriate factual setting, copyright misuse may be a viable defense against a claim of copyright infringement.

I believe Palko more correctly marks the tipping point of finality interests, not only in terms of divining which new rules should apply on habeas, but also in its reminder that a particular rule may be more or less crucial to the fairness of a case depending on its own factual setting.

Given that factual setting, the Court found a potential conflict between federal labor law and state libel law.

Second, although the factual setting of each case will be significant, our precedents indicate that a State normally can be held responsible for a private decision only when it has exercised coercive power or has provided such significant encouragement, either overt or covert, that the choice must in law be deemed to be that of the State.

This standard, of course, has no meaningful content independent of the factual setting in which it is applied.

The instant dispute is so for removed from the factual setting in Linn that the considerations supporting partial preemption of state libel law in that case simply do not obtain here.