When repeated using the second sub-sample, a consistent factor pattern emerged and so results from an analysis using the entire dataset are reported.
Analysis of the importance of 23 safety and security measures show a six factor pattern in thinking about measures.
Model A is factor pattern invariance; Model B is factor loading invariance; Model C is strong factorial invariance.
18– 21 In Swedish samples, the SPSQ has been shown to have a stable factor pattern constituting the subscales incompetence, role restriction, social isolation, spouse relationship problems and health problems.
Moreover, childhood depression has shown a risk factor pattern different from that of adolescent and adult onset depression, raising the question whether childhood depression is etiologically separate from the latter [ 5, 6].
For interpretation of the rotated factor pattern, an item was said to load onto a particular factor if the factor loading was greater than 0.40 for that factor, and was less than 0.40 for the other factors.
Items were assigned to a factor if pattern coefficient loadings were above ±0.45 and did not cross-load with a significant loading of ±0.3 or above onto any other factor [ 55].
Although fecal loading was slightly less prevalent as a factor, the pattern was similar to that for functional disability (H, 6 [20%]; A, 17 [57%]; R, 19 [63%], N, 21 [70%]) (Table 2).
