The phrase "a document filled with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing a document that contains a lot of information or specific content.
Example: "The report is a document filled with detailed analysis and recommendations for the upcoming project."
Alternatives: "a document containing" or "a document packed with".
He walks over to the computer at the far end of his L-shaped office and clicks a couple of times to print out a document filled with tiny-font numbers.
As evidence, he cited a brief filed on behalf of "180 Women Injured by Abortion," a document filled with personal "affidavits" by women who described vividly how sorry they were for having had terminated their pregnancies (notably, few actually discussed any particular method of abortion).
The organizers got what they wanted, a document filled with suggestions and calls for actions for the next 15 years.
On a recent day Doyle was dictating a complicated resolution to go before the county Board of Supervisors, a document filled with arcane legalese and descriptions of property boundaries.
For two months, I let the article go unwritten, a document filled with loose thoughts on my desktop.
The agreement is a complex document filled with measures that limit player and team salaries.
Your portfolio should be a professional document, filled with photographs that convey your designs.
It buried the report on a day when most reporters were preparing for the holidays and unlikely to pore through a 254-page document filled with long columns of numbers punctuated with footnotes and accounting jargon.
Pompeo testified a day after James Clapper, outgoing Director of National Intelligence, phoned Trump to deny that U.S. intelligence agencies had prepared or had circulated a 35-page document filled with unverified allegations against the president-elect.
The junta outlined a complex conspiracy to infiltrate the monasteries, the labour force and universities in an 18-page document filled with scores of names of alleged plotters and their backers.
Further disappointment awaits those braving the exhibition catalog, a fatuous, poorly written document filled with ideas cribbed for the most part from magazine essays on the artist and biographies.
