The phrase "a division arises" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where a disagreement or separation occurs, often in discussions or analyses of conflicts or differing opinions.
Example: "In the debate over climate change policies, a division arises between those who prioritize economic growth and those who advocate for environmental protection."
Alternatives: "a split occurs" or "a rift develops".
2 And when a division arose for the causes we have mentioned, the citizens who had been added to the rolls after the others, being more numerous and more powerful, put to death practically all of the original Sybarites and took upon themselves the colonization of the city.
If only one Supreme Court justice could attend, and a division arose between the district judge and the Supreme Court justice, the practice as required by the Judiciary Act of 1793 was to hold the case over until the next term.
If only one Supreme Court justice could attend (as was authorized by the Judiciary Act of 1793 ), and a division arose between the district judge and the Supreme Court justice, the practice was to hold the case over until the next term.
During the May, 1869 AERA conference, a division arose between the great majority of participants such as Stone who wanted to voice support for the proposed fifteenth amendment which would grant suffrage to African-American men, and a vocal minority who opposed any amendment to voting rights which would not provide universal suffrage.
Clearly, here, a professional division arises.
In this vision – taken to its logical conclusion by Uber – the acceptance of insecurity becomes a matter of heroism, and a new political division arises between the grafters and those – as Britannia Unchained witheringly puts it – "who enjoy public subsidies".
But they have to work for it – up to 60 hours a week". In this vision – taken to its logical conclusion by Uber – the acceptance of insecurity becomes a matter of heroism, and a new political division arises between the grafters and those – as Britannia Unchained witheringly puts it – "who enjoy public subsidies".
A more significant and in many ways more interesting division arises from placing primary emphasis on the level of economic development, with political or ideological differences as subsidiary matters.
Thereafter, Sean Wilentz shows, a fateful division arose between two starkly opposed democracies―a division contained until the election of Abraham Lincoln sparked its bloody resolution.
"Just a paragraph," he said, in keeping with the almost genial mood that has emerged in the forum where such bitter division arose over the war itself a year ago.
