Sentence examples for a distinguishable change from inspiring English sources
The phrase "a distinguishable change" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used when referring to a change that is noticeable or can be identified clearly. Example: "After implementing the new policy, there was a distinguishable change in employee productivity."
In this process, a distinguishable change in the engineering properties of soil occurred, including a reduction in liquid limit and an increase in hydraulic conductivity.
For this work, differences in the relative deuterium level between propeptide-bound and unbound GGCX greater than ±1.0 Da were reported as having a distinguishable change in protein conformation.
The Cu2+ recognition furnished a distinguishable color change of BPHTQ-1 from colorless to yellow with a significant hyperchromic shift at 300 nm.
That is, Craigslist's entry into local labor markets in the USA resulted in no distinguishable change in the unemployment rate in these markets because it cannibalized online traffic at competing websites.
However, no distinguishable change was observed in p15 expression.
No change (no distinguishable change, 0%); mild change (30%); moderate change (31 60%); severe change (61 90%); very severe change (91 100%).
No distinguishable change in CBF relative to the baseline CBF was identified over the subsequent 18 min.
Differences are classified as major (>2.0 Da), minor (1.0 2.0 Da), and no distinguishable change (<1.0 Da) where larger values represent greater protection from exchange in the propeptide-bound state.
Moving the A and T nucleotide to the opposite strands of the helix produces distinguishable changes in the intensity traces.
A Schiff-based chemosensor DSS was designed for selective and simultaneous detection and/or determination of F− and CN− by distinguishable changes in both solution color and spectroscopic responses within same sample due to the strong emission enhancement at distinct emission bands without any mask.
X-ray examination showed that in the blank control group, there was minimal proliferation at the end of the osteotomy surface immediately after the operation, and even 20 weeks later, bone defects showed minimal bone callus coverage with hardly distinguishable changes in length (Fig. 2a).
