The phrase "a discrepancy of two" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a difference or inconsistency quantified as two units, often in contexts like measurements, statistics, or comparisons.
Example: "There was a discrepancy of two in the reported figures, which raised concerns about the accuracy of the data."
Alternatives: "a difference of two" or "a variation of two".
For the variable X 3t, a discrepancy of two lags and two parameters in the denominator is specified.
For the variable X 2t, a discrepancy of two lags and a parameter in the denominator is specified.
The transfer function model adjusted for potency (Y t ) has included explanatory variables X 2t (distance between buildings) and X 3t (height of buildings) and according to the analyzes of the cross-correlations the following model transfer function was specified: For the variable X 2t, a discrepancy of two lags and a parameter in the denominator is specified.
In total, 87 out of 206 (42%) of the different cases involved a discrepancy of two or more grades (kappa value=0.25).
The authors called this a straw man argument, writing that "in a serious scientific discussion, a discrepancy of three orders of magnitude between what has been proposed in the literature and what is criticized suggests at best an inadequate grasp of the proposal".
There was a discrepancy of eight percentage points (54% compared with 46%) comparing the baseline for intervention districts to the baseline for matching districts.
You dial up Box Inc., saying that you are calling from Company B's purchasing department and that there is a discrepancy on one of the invoices.
The company said in a statement that it had decided to end the negotiations because of a "discrepancy of understandings of two companies".
The timescale presented here reveals a discrepancy of several hundred million years between the oldest (∼1000 Ma) putative pigmented stramenopile fossil [16], [17], [20], [21] and the inferred origination time of the extant ochrophyte clade.
However, a small proportion of samples, approximately 4% (that is 12/360), showed a large discrepancy of two quartile shifts (Table 2).
A discrepancy of a maximum of two loci was allowed to cover possible data errors [ 62], null alleles [ 63], and clonal mutations as previously described [ 64].
