Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a discrepancy in quality of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing differences or inconsistencies in the quality of products, services, or any measurable attributes.
Example: "The report highlighted a discrepancy in quality of the materials used in the construction project."
Alternatives: "a variation in quality of" or "a difference in quality of".
Exact(1)
Future research should investigate whether the found differences reflect differences in knowledge of and adherence to patient preferences, and indicate a discrepancy in quality of the end of life.
Similar(59)
Language barriers and differences in cultural traditions and perceptions have been offered as explanations to discrepancies in quality of care received (55, 58).
The investigation pointed up a discrepancy in the age of the cow.
We found a discrepancy in 8 (7.6%) of the 105 patients.
Although our findings highlight the important issue of the discrepancy in quality between surgeons and gastroenterologists, the lack of endoscopist-level variables in our study preclude us from isolating the modifiable predictors of endoscopist performance.
It could also indicate a discrepancy in structural (gene) annotation quality between different green algal species.
Is there a discrepancy between the quality of prenatal and postnatal parent-infant relationships and parents' representations of the child?
How else can we account for the nearly bipolar discrepancy in quality among the 29 stories assembled in "The Law of Averages"?
Despite the heterogeneity of the study population in terms of age and ethnicity, and the potential discrepancy in the quality of follow-up care after the fracture, the post-fracture mortality at 1 year observed in other countries is similar to that in Korea.
Quality of life improved during the study with no differences between groups, except for a discrepancy in treatment satisfaction in favor of glargine (online Table C).
This outcome may be explained by the discrepancy in the quality of assembly and annotation between human and opossum.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com