a direct violation of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a direct violation of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing actions or behaviors that clearly breach rules, laws, or agreements. Example: "The company's actions were deemed a direct violation of the environmental regulations set forth by the government."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Discrimination against the Roma is a direct violation of the E.U.'s Directive on Racial Equality and its official policy on Roma integration.

The New York Times

This was a direct violation of Georgia's territorial integrity.

The New York Times

It's incitement even if it may not be a direct violation of existing law," Berger said.

The Washington Post

"He said: 'Let all the flowers grow, but we will only water the ones we like.' After these words he should have been fired, because this is a direct violation of the constitution, a direct violation of human expression.

The Guardian - Film

Jens Stoltenberg, the Nato secretary general, described the launch as a a "direct violation" of five UN security council resolutions.

The Guardian

According to the Association of Civil Rights in Israel, the bill constituted "a direct violation of freedom of expression".

The Guardian

Paul G. Kirk Jr., the Democratic national chairman, called the new Republican program a "direct violation" of the settlement.

The New York Times

"Instead of dismantling these outposts, they are being transformed into permanent settlements," Mr. Erekat said, calling the move a direct violation of the peace plan.

The New York Times

The so-called referendum in the Ukrainian Autonomous Republic of Crimea planned on 16 March would be a direct violation of the Ukrainian constitution and international law.

The Guardian

He called the property sales a "misappropriation of public funds" and a direct violation of the terms by which the properties were ceded to CEMA Chile.

The Guardian

"Racism and hatred of foreigners constitute a direct violation of the basis of freedom, democracy and the rule of law," he added.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "a direct violation of", ensure that the violation is clearly and demonstrably linked to a specific rule, law, or agreement to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "a direct violation of" for minor infractions or situations where the breach is not explicit; instead, opt for milder terms like "inconsistent with" or "not in compliance with".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a direct violation of" functions as a noun phrase. It typically acts as a subject complement or object complement, providing more information about a subject or object by identifying something as a violation. Ludwig AI confirms this is a correct and usable phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

89%

Encyclopedias

5%

Science

2%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "a direct violation of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It signifies a clear and demonstrable breach of a rule, law, or agreement. Predominantly found in news and media, it serves to highlight non-compliance or condemn actions that contravene established norms. While the phrase is considered acceptable and common, it is advisable to use it precisely, ensuring the violation is clearly linked to a specific rule or agreement. Alternative phrases like "a clear breach of" or "an outright infringement of" can offer nuanced alternatives, but you should still use "a direct violation of" for clarity and impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a blatant contravention of

Emphasizes the obvious and intentional nature of the violation.

a flagrant disregard for

Highlights the disrespectful and open nature of the violation.

a clear breach of

Focuses on the act of breaking an agreement or rule.

an outright infringement of

Stresses the complete and total nature of the violation.

a fundamental transgression against

Indicates a serious violation of core principles.

a manifest non-compliance with

Highlights the evident lack of adherence to rules or regulations.

a palpable defiance of

Focuses on the obvious and intentional resistance to a rule or law.

a stark departure from

Emphasizes the significant difference from expected or agreed-upon behavior.

a distinct contravention of

Stresses the clear and unambiguous nature of the violation.

a pronounced disregard for

Highlights the noticeable lack of respect for a rule or law.

FAQs

How can I use "a direct violation of" in a sentence?

You can use "a direct violation of" to describe an action that clearly breaks a rule, law, or agreement. For example, "The company's actions were a direct violation of the environmental regulations."

What are some alternatives to "a direct violation of"?

Alternatives include "a blatant contravention of", "a clear breach of", or "an outright infringement of", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it always necessary to specify what is being violated when using "a direct violation of"?

Yes, it's best to specify what is being violated to provide clarity and avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "That's a direct violation", say "That's a direct violation of the contract."

What's the difference between "a direct violation of" and "a potential violation of"?

"A direct violation of" indicates a clear and demonstrable breach, while "a potential violation of" suggests that a breach may occur or is suspected but not yet confirmed. The former implies certainty, while the latter expresses uncertainty.