The phrase "a different sample of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to an alternative or distinct example or specimen from a larger group or collection.
Example: "In our research, we decided to analyze a different sample of the population to ensure our findings were comprehensive."
Alternatives: "another sample of" or "an alternative sample of".
Study 2 examined the relation between trait shyness and salivary cortisol in a different sample of undergraduate students who were not selected for individual differences in personality.
As each isolate was initiated with a different sample of the existing genotypes, the twenty isolates are likely to differ genetically, although the observed differences among isolates may also be due to other mechanisms, e.g. maternal effects.
She then looked at a different sample of centenarians from those involved in her study and found that more than three-quarters possessed many of the 150 genetic variants she had already identified.
In a separate study, concurrent validity was explored using a different sample of 3-and-4-year-olds (n = 1241).
The HSE is a repeated cross-sectional survey, which draws a different sample of nationally representative individuals living in England each year.
It is possible that a different practice-level PS matching approach yielding a different sample of providers in MRI and non-MRI practices would have produced different results.
The academic year study investigated new data from the same RCT, focusing on data collected from a different sample of students between January 2016 and May 2016.
Preliminary analyses with this criterion showed descriptive features similar to those observed in a different sample of Chilean adolescents such as group stability and number of isolated individuals (Berger & Rodkin, 2012).
It is impressive to know that a similar effect is found in a different sample of trees on an isolated island of Japan, on the opposite side of the Pacific Ocean.
The modal abundances of our sample of OC are very similar to the abundances obtained by Bunch et al. (2006) from a different sample of NWA 2977 and by Jolliff et al. (2003) from NWA 773 (Table 1).
The reason behind conducting the second phase of experts' review with a different sample of experts is to increase the reliability of the framework's validation and the results of the first experts' review.
