The phrase "a different prevalence of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing variations in the occurrence or frequency of a particular phenomenon or condition in different contexts or populations.
Example: "The study revealed a different prevalence of the disease among various age groups."
Alternatives: "a varying frequency of" or "a distinct occurrence of".
Indeed, 1) predisposition to NASH appears to cluster with that for metabolic risk factors within families, 2) ethnic differences, partially explained by a different prevalence of patatin-like phospholipase domain-contain 3 protein (PNPLA3) variants, have been reported [ 10- 12], and 3) studies in twins demonstrated a high heritability of liver enzymes values reflecting liver fat content [ 13].
Different health strategies, different methodologies or a different prevalence of obesity or other metabolic risk factors might explain these differences in contemporary studies in which the overall diabetes mellitus prevalence was very similar.
We hypothesized that these differences for plasma YB-1/p18 in the subgroups may be due to a different prevalence of malignancies.
However, several studies reported a different prevalence of headache types; again, this could be attributed to different methodologies and cultural diversity [6].
19 However, Mediterranean countries have a different eating pattern and a different prevalence of risk factors.
This study revealed a different prevalence of chronic diseases by citizenship, implying a different burden of primary care by citizenship.
Because of a different prevalence (pre-test probability) of SGA, results from hospital-based studies cannot be extrapolated to primary care settings.
The difference between rural and urban areas could partly account for some of these differences, but the results also point to other plausible explanatory factors, as several districts or states within a region have a very different prevalence of use of modern contraception in the postpartum period.
Two patients bearing the same germline NF1 mutation (P062 and P082) exhibited a quite different prevalence of LOH in dNFs and a different preference of LOH-generating mechanism (Table 2).
Amongst different joint regions, a significantly different prevalence of swelling was only seen in the knee joint, with a higher prevalence in anti-CCP positive patients (43.8% vs. 22.8%, p = 0.03).
However, men and women with lipodystrophy had a significantly different prevalence of the MS when stratified by BMI classes, regardless the criteria used to define the MS (Table 4).
