The phrase "a different issue in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a topic that diverges from the main subject or introduces a new concern related to the context.
Example: "While the budget is a significant concern, the environmental impact is a different issue in this project."
Alternatives: "a separate matter in" or "an unrelated topic in".
"It might be a different issue in 2016, when he's running in a Republican primary.
Michael A. Cusumano, a professor at the Sloan School of Management at M.I.T., raises a different issue in an essay published this week: the economics of MOOCs and the implications.
Mark Dubowitz, the foundation's CEO, lobbied Otaiba on a different issue in a March 10 , 2017 email.
From a policy perspective, our findings also raise the question of whether it is better to implement a number of narrowly focused policies, each aimed at a different issue in a different part of the ecological model, or a single "omnipolicy" which is comprehensive and complex.
A different issue mentioned in the focus group interviews is that how coercive routines are actually carried out may vary a lot: Many of our routines are in themselves limitations to patient autonomy, to be allowed to go outside the ward or not, monitoring, safety procedures, rounds, confiscation of cell phones.
A different issue, he said in an interview, was the impact that they had on infrastructure and towns, as a result of the often unregulated and widespread urban development that took place throughout Italy during the postwar boom.
But Ms. Quinn may ultimately be more vulnerable to attacks on a different issue: her vote in 2008 to overturn the city's term limits law and allow MayorMichael R. Bloombergto seek a third term.
He said that the bombing of Serb television in Belgrade during the Kosovo conflict was a different issue - the targets in question "appeared to have government facilities associated with them".
There are other factors at play, but ultimately it comes down to competition for limited funding (which is a whole different issue in itself) and the presumption that one program exists that has the "right" approach to solving the social issue in question (which is ridiculous).
I think it's a different issue, than, say it was in the nineteen-fifties.
