The phrase "a different conclusion for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing an alternative outcome or result in a particular context or argument.
Example: "After reviewing the evidence, the researchers arrived at a different conclusion for the impact of climate change on local ecosystems."
Alternatives: "an alternative conclusion for" or "a distinct conclusion for".
"[Clinton v. Jones] left open the question of whether concerns of federalism and comity compel a different conclusion for suits brought in state court," Schecter wrote in her decision.
According to the white paper: "Given the assessment that an analogous operation carried out pursuant to the AUMF would fall within the scope of the public-authority justification, there is no reason to reach a different conclusion for a CIA operation".
A different conclusion must be drawn for boulder B3; unfortunately it was not possible to estimate the age of the event responsible for the deposition of this boulder, because it does not show marine encrustation useful to perform radiocarbon age determination.
We see no justification for a different conclusion here.
"I'm sure all parties would have wished for a different conclusion".
If you take only the Koran, it is possible to argue for a different conclusion.
And there is no justification for a different conclusion here than in Martinez-Fuerte, where the ratio of illegal aliens detected to vehicles stopped was approximately.5percentt, as compared with the approximately 1.5percentt detection ratio in the one checkpoint conducted by Michigan and with the 1percentt ratio demonstrated by other States' experience.
We come to a different conclusion upon examining the results for New Brunswick.
For a different conclusion, the BBC talked to pilot Ian Hollingworth and using his speed estimate concluded that the runway was 18.37 miles long.
Were we considering the question of secondary meaning de novo, we might reach a different conclusion than did the district court, for the issue is close.
The fact that WHO reaches a different conclusion would not trigger legal consequences for the member state that failed to report an event.
