The phrase "a different beneficiary" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to an alternative recipient of benefits, funds, or advantages in a legal, financial, or general context.
Example: "In the event of my passing, I would like to designate a different beneficiary for my life insurance policy."
Alternatives: "another beneficiary" or "an alternate beneficiary."
Low take-up may indicate that the returns are highly heterogeneous across different beneficiary groups and that programs are not suitable for a subset of the population, particularly for vulnerable groups faced with complex constraints.
It is crucial to obtain the social value of a QALY from the perspectives of the public as different beneficiaries of health care have differing values of a QALY, due to variations in sociodemographic factors.
The Carvel will is a monster, including small bequests to 83 different beneficiaries, most of them loyal employees.
When social policy is evaluated using economic standards you get starkly different policies, different expectations, and different beneficiaries.
The government can have different thresholds for each program, intended to target different beneficiaries.
Moreover, the effect of individual policies is strengthened if they are part of a coherent activation strategy in which income support is combined with effective re-employment services tailored to the needs of different beneficiaries.
The papers present advancements in mapping and valuation, provide evidence for the contributions of biodiversity and landscapes to the generation of RES and human well-being, and shed light on distributional effects across different beneficiaries.
Research and policy analysis should focus on profiling instruments to improve understanding of beneficiary characteristics and constraints, mechanisms to identify business opportunities, guidelines to design and combine interventions tailored to different beneficiaries, the effectiveness of various implementation arrangements, and intervention cost-effectiveness and sustainability.
Since the inception of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in England, there have been questions about the empirical basis for the cost-per-QALY threshold used by NICE and whether QALYs gained by different beneficiaries of health care should be weighted equally.
This is the ambiguity that cites the dispensation of God and history, of covenant and Holocaust, to lay claim to a special relationship between Jews and the Land of Israel, then protests when the world — cynically or sincerely — holds Israel to a different, higher standard as beneficiaries of that dispensation.
