The phrase "a difference in strength of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing variations or contrasts in the intensity or power of something, such as physical forces, emotions, or arguments.
Example: "There is a noticeable difference in strength of the two competing teams, which could affect the outcome of the match."
Alternatives: "a variation in strength of" or "a disparity in strength of".
As IgG2A is considered to be indicative of "Th1-like" responses and IgG1, "Th2-like" responses, this result suggests both the lipid-coated microparticles and shed liposomes primed balanced Th1/Th2 responses and that the small difference in titers comparing LCMPs and shed vesicles reflects a difference in strength of priming rather than different Th-biasing of the antibody response.
Again, this would seem to indicate some idiosyncrasy in how effectively my desire is poised to influence my feelings, rather than indicating a difference in strength of desire (in this case, getting chicken pox seems like an expected ordeal of childhood, and that seems to blunt my felt response).
From preliminary observations, we can deduce that there is a difference in strength of the vortical flow (Supplementary Videos 1 and 2), which is highlighted in more detail in the subsequent results.
A difference in strength of activation is also suggested by the observation that men tend to have greater activation of the hypothalamus than women during the viewing of sexually arousing stimuli [18].
PAML model M2a was run twice for every gene on the two parts separately to determine whether there was a difference in strength of positive selection, number of positively selected sites, strength of purifying selection, and number of sites under purifying selection between the gene ends and the gene center.
Using these data [37] to calculate an effect size (dz) of 1.63 and using an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.95, we get a minimum sample required of n = 6 for detecting a difference in strength, which was the primary outcome of our study.
Although R i,final values were stronger (2.1 ± 1.9 bits; N = 20) than the natural site, exonic Type 3 cryptic splice sites did not show as great a difference in strength with a single exceptional case (of an acceptor).
The slightly inferior result for the Constant score was largely attributed to a median difference in strength of 2.0 kg between the affected and healthy shoulder.
The impact of the risk and protective factors was examined separately because there may be a difference in the strength of the risk effect and the strength of the protective effect of a bipolar variable [ 39].
From the results it is concluded that the applied glass type has a significant effect on both the initial failure strength – due to a difference in apparent strength of the glass types – and the post-breakage performance – due to a difference in fracture pattern of the glass types – of the reinforced glass beams.
Even if a more detailed analysis of agonism across contexts revealed a lack of an effect of food type on agonistic rates, as the current study suggests, it does not necessarily follow that this would indicate a lack of a difference in the strength of within-group contest competition (i.e., rank-related variation in net energy gain) associated with fruit versus leaf eating.
