The phrase "a difference in measurement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing variations or discrepancies in quantitative data or assessments.
Example: "The study revealed a significant difference in measurement between the two groups, indicating a need for further investigation."
Alternatives: "a discrepancy in measurement" or "a variation in measurement".
As no clear criteria exist for acceptable value of intra-rater and inter-rater agreements for active ROM outcome measures, we defined, a priori, that a difference in measurement between the raters of 10% of the total range of measurement values would be acceptable.
Given the similar reliability of the 6-item and the 3-item scales of the LOT-R in our study (α = .65 and.54 for the 6-item and 3-item optimism scales), and also in other studies, e.g., [ 30, 31], this difference is not expected to be due to a difference in measurement error.
This is a difference in measurement or memory allocation.
The second one, because of both the anisotropy of the ice sheet surface properties and of the linear antenna polarization, introduces a difference in measurements at crossover points.
Based on the assumption of a relevant treatment difference of 5 bursts/min a sample size of 11 subjects was calculated for the parameter burst frequency at baseline to achieve a power of 80% to detect a difference in measurements after ozone or clean air (two sided t-test, type I error of 5%).
A difference in the measurement ranges between ELISA and RIA human vaspin systems have been observed [ 16– 16].
A retrospective study to see whether a difference in molecular measurement is seen in children who develop adverse health outcomes, including low birth weight, and see how this relates to in-utero exposure.
D. A retrospective study to see whether a difference in molecular measurement is seen in children who develop adverse health outcomes, including low birth weight, and see how this relates to in-utero exposure.
We assumed that in a large sample of normal vaginal deliveries randomized only to a difference in blood measurement techniques, the mean blood loss recorded would not be significantly different if the two methods had the same reliability.
With a reported coefficient of variation of 11% in measurements of SC using the technique described above, 8 and reported SC CSA of 12 890 µm, this study has 90% power to detect a difference in the measurement of SC CSA as small as 1321.2 µm, as significant.
I have taken great care and trouble to determine this point, by carefully measuring and comparing the two limbs, and I do not know that I have ever seen a case of well-marked uncomplicated hip-joint disease where there was a difference in the measurement in which the lengthening or shortening did not depend upon the inclination of the pelvis.
