Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
The phrase "a difference in evaluation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing varying assessments or judgments regarding a particular subject or situation.
Example: "There was a noticeable difference in evaluation between the two experts on the effectiveness of the new treatment."
Alternatives: "a discrepancy in assessment" or "a variation in judgment."
Exact(1)
The most fundamental difference, however, is, arguably, a difference in evaluation.
Similar(59)
It makes a difference in performance evaluation.
This might be due not only to a difference in the evaluation methods that were applied but also to a difference in training characteristics.
Therefore, It neither does nor makes a difference in our evaluation whether we make use of research or not (participant 9).
The difference in the number of nodes observed between corrected P-TRAP values and FO might be related to a difference in the evaluation of this feature between the software and the field operator.
Secondly, there was a difference in the evaluation measure used for the neurolysis group and the reconstruction group: for the neurolysis groups, Mallet subscores were presented, and for the reconstruction group the global Mallet score was provided.
To do so, we utilize a difference-in-differences (DD) evaluation strategy to estimate the effect of program participation on a wide variety of indicators (Abadie 2005; Imbens and Wooldridge 2009) This strategy compares the average change over time in the outcome variable for the treatment group to the average change over time for the control group.
On that issue, my difference with the Court may amount to nothing less than a difference in our respective evaluations of the importance of individual liberty, a serious albeit inevitable source of constitutional disagreement.
I-F = initial and final evaluation In the developmental comparison between the first and last evaluation a difference in HR at rest was verified, with a reduction in the Nonsmoker Group when compared with the Ex-smoker Group (t = 2.076 and p = 0.045).
This discrepancy in conclusion can be attributed to the difference in evaluation method (modified RECIST versus TE), since tumor response can be evaluated differently with different criteria.
This difference in evaluation is statistically significant (P-value = 0.000).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com