A similar deviation was detected in the distal root of 10′s in 3 cases (15%), but the distance between the distal root of 10′s and the mesial root of 11′s was larger and deformities were less frequent compared to the aforementioned dental roots.
Overall, the tests performed showed a high level of repeatability, although in certain cases a high standard deviation was detected, in all likelihood due to the small variations in size and edge bevelling between different samples of the same archwire, not to mention small variations in torquing key positioning.
No significant relation between mean GC3 and GC3 standard deviation was detected in nonamniote vertebrates, with for example actinopterygians covering a wide range of mean GC3 but exhibiting a very narrow range of GC3-heterogeneity (fig. 1 A).
If a long-term deviation is detected, this information could be used to readjust the system via back-propagation or other learning algorithms (for example Kawato and Gomi 1992).
With probability 1−q M,n (L,p th) the deviation is detected, so the system moves to a punishment phase; with probability q M,n (L,p th) the system remains in the review phase.
Lastly, regional differences in circular deviation were detected (Figure S3F, p<0.03) but did not meet criteria for multiple comparisons, and regional circular deviation was not significantly correlated with phase (r2 = 0.01).
In SKOV3 cells, 25.1±1.4% (mean±standard deviation) were detected as TUNEL-positive under serum-free conditions.
Ripple epochs with maximal amplitude higher than four standard deviations above the mean, beginning and ending at one standard deviation were detected.
At an RPK of 60, no sequence deviations were detected for 3188 or 53% of the expressed gene models.
The proportional hazard assumptions were assessed by a test based on Schoenfeld residuals, and no deviations were detected.
Nevertheless an extra calibration procedure was organized twice during the research using a 3 liter calibration syringe and no significant deviations were detected.
