The phrase "a developer which" is not correct in standard written English; it should be "a developer who." You can use "a developer who" when referring to a person in a descriptive context, particularly in professional or technical writing.
Example: "I spoke with a developer who specializes in mobile applications."
Alternatives: "a developer that" or "a developer who is."
In 2015, against Spurs' fundamental opposition, the council took the decision not to entrust the club with the development and held a competitive process to appoint a developer, which resulted in the selection of Lendlease in September 2017.
But a developer, which has recently contracted to buy the site, has other plans.
That's his perception as a developer, which is fine, but I don't think of it that way.
When communities organize, they can often negotiate a community benefits agreement with a developer, which secures a portion of the project profits for meeting community needs like job training and affordable housing.
For example, frequently the housing association will itself only lease a number of flats in a block built by a developer, which it then sub-leases to people on a shared ownership basis.
The agency said it is bound by a legal agreement made between Yorkshire Forward and a developer which wants to build a hotel, shops, restaurants and offices on the site.
New Jersey Transit entered into an agreement with a private developer, which would construct a neighborhood of commercial and residential buildings anchored by a train station.
The false impression was given at the time that the houses were to be holiday homes in a scheme by a US developer which would aid tourism.
Update: Some readers are complaining that I am pointing to an isolated case of a single developer, which of course isn't representative of an entire market.
In October, the club stated that they hoped to finance a further expansion of the stadium to 14,000 seats by selling part of the lot to a private developer, which would use it to build a 17-story building.
Part of the project would be funded by a private developer, which in return would take over an existing federal courthouse building on Spring Street.
