Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "a developer for whom" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a developer in relation to a specific action or situation that involves them, often in a formal context.
Example: "She is a developer for whom collaboration is essential to project success."
Alternatives: "a developer who" or "a developer that".
Exact(1)
"His architecture has always looked like sculptural painting," said Tom Bloxham, the chairman of Urban Splash, a developer for whom Alsop has designed several schemes.
Similar(59)
Even now, those wanting to preserve Civil War battlefields like Chancellorsville as a place of meditation are up against developers for whom golf courses and front lawns whisper the great American mantra of "move on".
At the same time, the fact that Asian investors are generally comfortable with buying "off plan" — having seen only floor plans and renderings of apartment buildings that have yet to be built — makes them popular with developers, for whom the early commitments mean access to crucial funding.
Phil Bicking is a developer for Duke Web Services.
One such client was the developer Thomas Frouge, for whom Mr. Bien designed 1 East 67th Street, at Fifth Avenue, in 1961, after Sylvan Bien's death in 1959.
In one instance, according to the complaint, the two men were recorded on security video inside the offices of the developer, Sheldon Solow, for whom Mr. Dreier had done legal work in the past.
Calvin Rodriquez of El Cajon, co-owner of the Goode house, confirmed the property is nearing the close of escrow for sale to a developer, whom he declined to name.
But the town board and residents living near the site have been divided over whether to preserve the property's runways as an attraction for industrial tenants, or to seek residential developers or others for whom an active airport would be a noisy nuisance.
Haply a girl for whom you ache.
A rush for whom?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com