Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a developer by the name of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when introducing or referring to a specific developer, often in a context where their name is relevant to the discussion.
Example: "I recently spoke with a developer by the name of Sarah who is working on an innovative app."
Alternatives: "a developer named" or "a developer called".
Exact(3)
In 1998, a developer by the name of Papyrus Design Group released Grand Prix Legends, a racing game about the 1967 Formula One series.
A friend of Hill's had worked with a developer by the name of Alex Kouznetsov on an application in the past.
This change was first noticed last month when a developer by the name of OrangePixel had updated its game Gunslugs 2. Apple at the time rejected the game by saying that a screenshot showed "violence against a human being".
Similar(57)
The real-life Cohn, who died from complications of AIDS in 1986, was an important mentor to a young New York real-estate developer by the name of Donald Trump.
By the name of?
The name property of a virtual character can be specified by a game developer as a value of the type string, which allows a scenario author to define the name of the character.
Some of the most recent and noteworthy Archie stories were written by Riverdale developer, and current Archie Comics (that's the name of the publisher, confusingly) Chief Creative Officer (CCO) Roberto AguiRobertoasa.
The foreign contributor, a German developer named Thomas Kramer, made the $20,000 contribution in the name of his secretary.
"By moving locals out in the name of tourism, the land can be sold at a higher value to developers and to attract commerce; the local government can make a lot of money that way," he says.
According to the company's Web site, the complex is to be called "Country Garden" after the name of the developer.
UPDATES: - 11 53 a.m.: This article has been updated to include the name of the developer of the Skechers distribution center.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com