a destroyer of unity on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a destroyer of unity on" is grammatically correct but may be contextually awkward in written English.
It can be used when describing something or someone that negatively impacts or disrupts unity in a specific context or situation. Example: "His actions were seen as a destroyer of unity on the team, leading to increased tensions among members."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Cardinal George Pell, brought to the Vatican to revamp its murky finances, was this week accused of being a "destroyer of unity" on child sex abuse in his native Australia.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

I am a destroyer of worlds!

Vice

After the war, on 13 April 1968, a destroyer of the Bundesmarine (Federal German Navy) was christened Mölders in Bath, Maine (USA).

Wikipedia

On net, soccer is a destroyer of happiness.

The Washington Post

The ancient literature on Indian medicine, Sushruta, describes gurmar as a destroyer of madhumeha (glycosuria) and other urinary disorders.

BioMed Research International

The Internet is a destroyer of costs, which is beautiful.

Forbes

"He is a destroyer of several lives.

Huffington Post

A hero to men, a destroyer of love to women.

Vice

Both men put on a show of unity.

The Economist

"This is a sign of unity".

The New York Times

"Also a sense of unity.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "a destroyer of unity on", ensure the context clearly identifies what the unity is and how it is being destroyed. Specificity strengthens the impact.

Common error

Avoid using "a destroyer of unity on" in vague situations. Ensure the subject's disruptive impact on unity is evident, not speculative or assumed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a destroyer of unity on" functions as a nominal phrase, identifying something or someone that negatively impacts unity. As Ludwig AI shows, this phrase is not very common, but grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "a destroyer of unity on" is a grammatically sound, though uncommon, way to describe something that negatively impacts cohesion. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is infrequent but valid. The primary context is news media, where it serves to identify entities responsible for discord. For greater clarity, consider alternatives like "a cause of division regarding" or "a factor disrupting harmony concerning". While grammatically correct, mindful use of this phrase ensures it effectively conveys the intended meaning and impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a reason for disunity in relation to

Directly states the phrase leads to a lack of unity.

a cause of division regarding

Focuses on identifying the phrase as a source of disagreement.

an element undermining solidarity regarding

Emphasizes the weakening of group cohesion.

a contributor to fragmentation concerning

Focuses on the breaking apart of a whole.

a factor disrupting harmony concerning

Highlights the disturbance of peaceful relations.

a promoter of disharmony regarding

Suggests actively encouraging a lack of harmony.

a force fracturing agreement on

Presents the phrase as breaking apart consensus.

a source of contention pertaining to

Highlights the phrase as creating dispute.

a trigger for conflict about

Emphasizes initiating disagreement or struggle.

a catalyst for discord about

Identifies the phrase as triggering conflict.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "a destroyer of unity on" for better clarity?

Consider alternatives like "a cause of division regarding", or "a factor disrupting harmony concerning", depending on the specific context. Specificity will improve clarity.

Is "a destroyer of unity on" formal or informal?

The phrase "a destroyer of unity on" leans towards a neutral register. For more formal contexts, consider /s/phrases+that+undermine+cohesion or /s/factors+contributing+to+disunity. In informal settings, simpler expressions might be more suitable.

What does "a destroyer of unity on" imply?

It suggests that something or someone is actively or passively causing disunity or discord, breaking down existing cohesion within a group or situation.

Can "a destroyer of unity on" be used in a positive way?

Generally, no. The phrase carries negative connotations as it describes something that breaks down positive group dynamics. While destruction can be necessary for rebuilding, the phrase itself does not inherently imply a positive outcome.