Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Patients at risk of developing ARDS often have a decrease in chest wall compliance secondary to fluid overload and/or increased intra-abdominal pressure.
In ALI patients, the prone position induces a decrease in chest wall compliance significantly correlated with oxygenation improvement.
In addition, the provision of real-time feedback alone was actually associated with a decrease in chest compression flow-fraction (mean difference, –4.56; 95% CI, –7.64 to –1.48; p = 0.004).
Similar(57)
In supine position, an upward displacement of the diaphragm resulting from an increased abdominal pressure induces an increase in the stiffness of the chest wall and a decrease in the chest wall compliance [ 13, 29].
In a prospective study by Chiumello et al. [43], comparing control patients with those with acute lung injury or ARDS, increasing PEEP from 5 to 15 cmH2O led to a decrease in lung, chest wall, and respiratory system elastance.
In contrast, we found that applying the thoraco-pelvic supports led to a further decrease in chest wall compliance.
As the uterus enlarges, FRC decreases by 10%to25%5% of the previous value due to a 35%to40%0% decrease in chest wall compliance [ 42].
Furthermore, we did not measure post-sternotomy catecholamine discharge or a possible decrease in chest wall compliance to explain changes in CI or SVV/PPV.
The use of thoraco-pelvic supports, however, did lead to a significant decrease in chest wall compliance from 158.1 ± 77.8 to 102.5 ± 38.0 ml/cmH2O and a significantly increased pleural pressure from 4.3 ± 1.9 to 6.1 ± 1.8 cmH2O, in comparison with the prone position without supports.
Downwind locations were associated with a decrease in reporting of chest symptoms for almost all year comparisons.
The major part of assessed health related quality of life is unresponsive to a decrease in severity of chest pain symptoms in a consecutive cohort of ordinary patients with coronary artery disease.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com