The phrase "a decrease in benefits" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a reduction in advantages, payments, or services provided to individuals or groups, often in contexts like employment or social services.
Example: "The recent policy changes have resulted in a decrease in benefits for many employees, leading to dissatisfaction among the workforce."
Alternatives: "a reduction in benefits" or "a decline in benefits".
On the picket line, workers often grow furious as they discuss the concessions demanded by management: a two-year freeze on raises for current workers, a requirement that workers pay $780 in annual premiums for family health coverage, and a cap on annual employer health contributions, which would most likely cause a decrease in benefits.
Using portability more than once may result in a decrease in benefits.
Young people also bear more financial risk in adulthood due to a decrease in welfare benefits, increased life expectancy and uncertain economic and job prospects.
The steam oil ratio (SOR) usually increases during the later steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process, resulting in a decrease in economic benefits and an increase of oil remaining in the wedge zones.
While the numbers of the homeless are rising all over the nation, largely because of a decrease in Federal benefits and public housing, Mr. Boden said, San Francisco's problem is exacerbated by its soaring housing prices, the highest in the country.
When the bit rate requirements for CRUs become less uniform, decreases due to a decrease in the benefits of user diversity.
They address labor market reforms only as a cut in the "wage markup" (Almeida et al. 2010; Kilponen and Ripatti 2006) or as a decrease in unemployment benefits (Deák et al. 2011; Krause and Uhlig 2012), however, while we can be somewhat more specific on various measures to be analyzed.
We find that measures aiming at reducing (policy-induced) outside option of workers, such as a decrease in unemployment benefits, public wages or, to a lesser extent, public-sector employment, seem most beneficial to foster output, employment, international competitiveness and fiscal balances.
This should be judged according to the benefit/risk ratio of the research protocols; that is, the level of protection should be progressively higher in relation to an increase in risks and a decrease in expected benefits.
Finally, results reported in Table5, Panel E excluding country fixed effects are more significant than those obtained with country fixed effects, with positive effects of a decrease in the benefit replacement rates that may materialize from the first year.
To qualify for a waiver, a state, an employer or an insurer must show that compliance with the federal requirement would cause "a significant increase in premiums or a decrease in access to benefits".
