The phrase "a decision released on" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the publication or announcement of a decision made by a court, organization, or authority on a specific date.
Example: "The court issued a decision released on March 15, 2023, regarding the case."
Alternatives: "a decision published on" or "a decision announced on".
Justice Burke, who handled both state suits, dismissed them both, the second one in a decision released on Oct. 15.
In a decision released on Friday, the judge, George A. O'Toole of federal District Court, said the law would make it easy for competitors to duplicate popular brands.
"The Arizona act violates the freedom of choice provision of the Medicaid Act precisely because every Medicaid beneficiary has the right to select any qualified health care provider," Judge Wake ruled in a decision released on Friday.
Justice Kagan thought the tossed fish qualified as a "tangible object" under a federal statute banning evidence tampering; her liberal colleagues did not.Another curious and apparently unprecedented lineup appeared in a decision released on May 18th.
Bartle agreed with most of a decision released on May 11 by the arbitrator, Alan Symonette, and ordered baseball to rehire Drew Coble, Gary Darling, Bill Hohn, Greg Kosc, Larry Poncino, Larry Vanover and Joe West.
In a decision released on Tuesday, Judge Samuel A. Alito wrote for the panel that "there is no federal constitutional bar to Mr. Chadwick's indefinite confinement for civil contempt" as long as he can pay.
Judge Dear made his intentions known in a written decision released on Thursday in a run-of-the-mill Criminal Court case: Julio Figueroa, 38, was cited for illegally drinking a cup of beer on a city sidewalk near his home in Greenwood Heights, Brooklyn.
A provision of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations grants certain diplomatic agents an extension of diplomatic immunity for a period of time after one's official duties have ended, but Justice McKeon, in a written decision released on Tuesday, ruled that the extension did not apply to Mr. Strauss-Kahn.
In a written decision released on June 19, investigators ruled that the advertising with barbed wire should be discontinued because "while consumers may not literally believe that body wash is as harsh on skin as barbed wire, such imagery nonetheless communicates an unsupported and disparaging message that competing products can seriously damage the skin".
In a 51-page decision released on Thursday, Judge J. Paul Oetken explained that as a public figure, Mr. Biro failed to show that the writer, David Grann, or the magazine had acted "recklessly" or "with actual malice".
The government filed an appeal of this decision but was overruled by an Ontario Superior Court decision released on January 6, 2005; however, a subsequent ruling by the Ontario Court of Appeal on June 13 , 2005granted the government permission to appeal the decision.
