The phrase "a decision maker for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to someone who has the authority to make decisions in a specific context or organization.
Example: "As a decision maker for the project, she will determine the direction and resources needed for its success."
Alternatives: "a decision authority for" or "a decision leader for".
Nor can one simply look to the CEO to find a decision maker for a corporate plane.
Michael Jordan had almost everything with the Washington Wizards: adulation from fans and the news media, a piece of ownership, the freedom to indulge in his competitive urges for two more seasons on the basketball court and power as a decision maker for a National Basketball Association team.
It requires using different methods which incorporate the conflicting criteria and help a decision maker for identifying the best alternative.
This undermines trust in such predictions and prevents the creation of an "action plan" by a decision maker, for example a medicinal chemist.
The basic principle that is applied by the courts is that where statute grants a power to a decision-maker for purpose A, it is unlawful for the decision-maker to exercise the power for purpose B, because the decision-maker would be using the power for an unauthorized purpose.
In Canada, surveys disclosed that 87% of the public favored the family as a decision-maker for an incompetent patient and 84% supported the right to withdraw life support from a comatose patient [ 30, 31].
(J) potential locations for the facilities a decision maker (a firm, for example) has to decide on: (J subseteq bigcup _{i in I} M_i).
In the U.S., a patient guardian is usually defined as a legal decision maker for a patient unable to express oneself, or make health care decisions [ 5].
Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a company is not allowed to provide a personal benefit to a decision maker in return for business.
This could allow a decision maker to determine, for example, the emission rate that would not exceed a 10-6 maxindividualidual cancer risk with 95% confidence.
This is a graphical representation of the probability of an intervention being cost effective over a monetary range for a decision maker's willingness to pay for an additional unit of health gain.
