The phrase "a debatable question" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a question that is open to discussion or disagreement, often in academic or argumentative contexts.
Example: "The topic of climate change is a debatable question that invites various perspectives and opinions."
Alternatives: "a contentious issue" or "a controversial topic".
It's not a debatable question".
One way in which search engines are clearly superior to libraries (a debatable question overall) is that they are entirely welcoming of frivolous curiosity, no matter where you might be or what you might be doing.
Blair Horner, legislative director of the New York Public Interest Research Group, said: "It's a debatable question whether there is a legitimate separation-of-powers issue between the inspector general's authority over the legislative branch.
I do think that Xi sees the depth of difficulties that the Communist party faces, but whether his actions are improving the party's longevity or shortening it is a debatable question".
One is the mayor of Sabang, the island's only city,… One way in which search engines are clearly superior to libraries (a debatable question overall) is that they are entirely welcoming of frivolous curiosity, no… Driving through northern Aceh, I came across what my driver described as an elephant "training center," apparently run by the Indonesian forestry service.
(Precisely how long remains a debatable question).... Mentions that Bradley attempted to find a market for worms in Sierre Leone... Tells how his death was announced in January of 2003 and that his ashes were to be scattered in Hawaii when the time was right..
What is a more debatable question is when — or even if — all those investments will truly pay off.
That is an endlessly debatable question.
This was, he said, an "interesting and debatable" question, but by no means the most difficult one, which, in his opinion, was whether the fund should exist at all.
I think that's a much more interesting (and debatable) question than 'Do women have what it takes?'" Ms. Green said.
Some of the articles have nothing to do with the headline-grabbing office expenses, but, unlike the expenses, involve a debatable legal question: whether the justices broke the law by approving higher-than-allowed payments to retired circuit judges who filled in on the bench in their absences.
