The phrase "a criterion for how" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a standard or principle that guides the evaluation or assessment of a particular process or outcome.
Example: "The researchers established a criterion for how the data should be analyzed to ensure consistency in their findings."
Alternatives: "a standard for how" or "a measure for how".
Based on the results of this study, we propose a new criterion for how to order the individuals in a composite core.
We derive a simple mathematical criterion for how "effective" transmission by clinically immune individuals must be for bistability to occur.
Finally, we analyzed each GHRS criterion for how early and with what frequency it was met and arbitrarily defined the most effective criterion as the one that was most sensitive and earliest.
The problem is that everyone's sweetness barometer is different, and also that the stereotypical person asking this question doesn't know any other criteria for how to describe a cocktail.
The ESUR guidelines provide explicit criteria for how to rate a lesion for every specific MRI parameter, but a consistent instruction on how to calculate the overall PI-RADS score is lacking.
The key is to take the attributes of a crisis and consider them to be design criteria for how to shape improvement projects all the time.
If we assume that a state is in principle entitled to make judgments about when a particular treatment is too expensive to provide within its healthcare systems, given available resources, we have to find a way to examine claims about appropriateness, and provide criteria for how these judgments are to be made.
And what does it mean for such a program to "work?" But the book doesn't provide many specific criteria for how we should evaluate the ethics of educational and other incentives.
Although the ESUR guideline provides explicit criteria for how to generate each single-score, it lacks a consistent instruction on how to calculate the overall PI-RADS score [ 10, 13, 14].
