Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
a credible date for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "a credible date for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the reliability or validity of a specific date related to an event or information. Example: "The historian provided a credible date for the signing of the treaty, which helped clarify the timeline of events."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
Credible rumors of an October date for the 18th Party Congress had been circulating but something looks to have pushed back the opening.
News & Media
"A credible push for structural reforms and privatization are essential".
News & Media
But it would be a credible forum for grievances.
News & Media
These provide a credible foundation for describing effective online learning.
Is it really a credible guarantee for safety at all?
Science
Anti-TNF therapy including ETA could be a credible alternative for AS patients who have uveitis.
A credible candidate for the induction of IFN-α secretion by plasmacytoid DCs is viral infection.
Biomineralization can offer a credible prediction of bioactivity for the synthetic bone regeneration materials.
Science
"When people say we must have a date, it is another way of saying we need a credible plan that gives us a date.
News & Media
So is this a credible way forward for school food?
News & Media
This paper recommends "neutral hypnosis" as a credible placebo control for hypnotherapy trials.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "a credible date for", ensure that you can provide supporting evidence or reasoning to justify its credibility. For example, cite the source of the date or explain why it's considered reliable.
Common error
Avoid presenting a date as "a credible date for" without offering any justification or source. This can undermine your argument and make your information seem less trustworthy.
Source & Trust
76%
Authority and reliability
3.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "a credible date for" functions as an adjectival phrase modifying the noun "date", indicating that the date being referred to is trustworthy and believable. It establishes the reliability of the specified time in relation to an event or piece of information.
Frequent in
News & Media
0%
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "a credible date for" is a phrase used to describe a specific time that is considered reliable and trustworthy. Ludwig AI shows that the phrase itself is grammatically correct, but the frequency of examples for this specific phrase is limited, indicating that there is little information available. Therefore, when using this phrase, ensure that you provide adequate evidence or justification to support the credibility of the date. This is particularly important in contexts where accuracy is paramount, such as academic, scientific, or professional settings. Alternatives like reliable date for, "plausible date for", or believable date for can also be used, depending on the context and the level of certainty you want to convey.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
a plausible date for
Focuses on the possibility or likelihood of the date being correct or accurate.
a believable date for
Emphasizes the ease with which the date can be accepted as true or accurate.
a reliable date for
Highlights the trustworthiness and consistency of the date information.
a trustworthy date for
Stresses the dependability and integrity of the date in question.
an authentic date for
Indicates that the date is genuine and not fabricated or misrepresented.
a verifiable date for
Implies that the date can be confirmed or proven to be accurate.
a substantiated date for
Suggests that there is evidence or proof to support the given date.
a confirmed date for
Indicates that the date has been officially recognized or validated.
an established date for
Emphasizes that the date is well-known and generally accepted as accurate.
a validated date for
Suggests that the date has been rigorously checked and confirmed as correct.
FAQs
What does "a credible date for" mean?
The phrase "a credible date for" refers to a specific point in time that is considered believable, reliable, or trustworthy based on available evidence or sources.
How can I ensure that I am providing "a credible date for"?
To ensure you provide a credible date, always cite your sources, cross-reference information from multiple sources, and explain any uncertainties or limitations in the available data. Using phrases like "plausible date for" might be useful when a date is not definitively confirmed.
What are some alternatives to saying "a credible date for"?
Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "reliable date for", ""plausible date for"", or "believable date for" to convey a similar meaning.
When is it appropriate to use the phrase "a credible date for" in writing?
It is appropriate to use "a credible date for" when you want to emphasize the reliability or trustworthiness of a specific date. This is particularly useful in historical, scientific, or analytical writing where accuracy is important.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
76%
Authority and reliability
3.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested