The phrase "a corresponding variability" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing changes or differences that relate to or match another variable or factor in a given context.
Example: "The study revealed a corresponding variability in the results based on the different environmental conditions."
Alternatives: "an associated variability" or "a related variability".
However, in clinical oncological PET, variability of the uptake period is unavoidable [9, 10] which directly translates into a corresponding variability of the measured tracer uptake [11].
One should not overlook the message from Figures 2D and 3 – the variability in tumour genotype/phenotype determines a corresponding variability of the time scales and life histories associated with disease progression.
There was also a variability in LOX activity among cultivars belonging to the same haplotype, which cannot be explained by a corresponding variability in transcript levels of the Lpx-B1 genes and alleles.
Here, we can confirm that the molecular variability is matched by a corresponding phenotypic variability (see also Herpigny et al. 2012 for a study under field conditions).
In production processes the environmental conditions in the fermentor may be variable, causing corresponding variability in physiological parameters.
The broad range of fault rock textures and architectures found on the Class A, C, and D continuum may produce important corresponding variability in hydrologic properties in ignimbrites.
This paper presents a methodology that allows quantifying the corresponding variability in ground vibration predictions.
The corresponding variability in rainfall appears to have been related to the effects of environmental degradation.
The study focuses especially on the simulation of snow accumulation and the corresponding variability of snow.
The corresponding variability in the resultant force at the knee for these assigned positions was 32 ± 33 N for Manipulator 1 and 4 ± 1 N for Manipulator 2. Furthermore, the repeatability of the trajectory of each manipulator while moving between assigned positions (path repeatability) was 0.8 mm for Manipulator 1 while the path repeatability for Manipulator 2 was improved (0.1 mm).
For each profile set, we compute the (n_{P} times 14) AF: ({text{AF}}left( {P_{k},theta,S_{l},T_{i} } right)), the (n_{P}) average amplification factors AFm: ({text{AF}}_{text{m}} left( {P_{k},theta,T_{i} } right)) together with their corresponding variability (sigma_{text{AF}} left( {P_{k},theta,T_{i} } right)).
