The phrase "a corresponding indicator" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a sign or signal that relates to or matches another element in a discussion or analysis.
Example: "In the study, we found a corresponding indicator that suggested a strong correlation between the two variables."
Alternatives: "a related marker" or "an associated signal".
After determining which risk factors were independently associated with a given outcome at the p<0.0001 level, we created a corresponding indicator variable for each of those risk factors that indicated if the variable was missing.
Many reports contained narrative descriptions of an activity, output, or outcome, which implied the nature of a corresponding indicator, while fewer explicitly defined indicators.
In school-based settings, both Sahota and colleagues and Müller and colleagues were able to modify FV consumption patterns, and the latter study achieved a corresponding indicator of obesity prevention [ 7, 8].
The constraints (41) ensure that the departure time from i to j with the vehicle k has a non-zero value if the corresponding indicator variable is equal to one and the upper bound of the departure time is equal to the constant of M (the possible latest departure time), and finally, constraints (42 44) impose non-negativity and integrity on the variables.
For example, if p is the peak C043564_ and -0.15 is a cut-point of p, then the corresponding indicator variable I(C043564_ > -0.15) is equal to 1 for the observations for which C043564_ exceeds -0.15, and 0 for the other observations.
However, these data were partially captured in the free-text sections of the VA form, for which we developed an automated search for the 'keyword' and mapped it onto the corresponding indicator.
Each technology was ranked from 1 to 4 according to the corresponding indicator, with 1 being the best (and 4 the least) technology for that indicator.
If the modeling outcome deviates greatly from the normative state of the corresponding indicator (i.e., derived from political goals as formulated in official policy documents of the federal government, and not from quantitative valuations), a policy change seems indicated.
With partners from both academia and industry we identify relevant quantitative indicators for structuring the assessment model and for calculating corresponding indicator weightings, using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP).
The corresponding indicator function for defecting is 1– c it.
Over the past three decades, the sensitivity, robustness, and flexibility of the corresponding indicator systems have increased significantly [ 3, 4].
