The phrase "a correct judgment" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the accuracy or validity of a decision or conclusion made in a particular context, such as legal, personal, or professional situations.
Example: "After reviewing all the evidence, the committee reached a correct judgment regarding the case."
Alternatives: "an accurate decision" or "a valid conclusion".
So, to that extent, these two politicians are making a correct judgment.
But almost all the decisions that went against them related to bad offside calls, which are two a penny in football: to make a correct judgment, a linesman is required to look simultaneously at the player passing the ball and the player receiving it, a physical impossibility that produces tantrums in every single game.
Therefore, using the test method obtained by us, we have a larger probability to make a correct judgment.
Prevention/management processing is necessary in order to induce a correct judgment of the driver and provide a prompt settlement of an accident on the road traffic situation.
If instead we add evaluators with 60% accuracy, the probability of a correct judgment decreases and does not increase until we add 22 judges, see Figure 1B (see Methods: Judge Accuracy Curve with Inferior Judges).
Using a set of 20 reference compounds with different embryotoxic potencies (non-embryotoxic, weakly embryotoxic, and strongly embryotoxic), the EST was shown to provide a correct judgment in 78% of all experiments.
Should "an appropriate decision" be given preference over an "officially correct" judgment?
But an earlier correct judgment simply reaches the conclusion that the law already supported when it was delivered.
He had made a cold but correct judgment about the deficiencies of the team who had nurtured him since childhood and spotted the potential in a struggling rival.
It is possible to develop a basic (and correct) judgment about which type of person is trustworthy and which type you should be cautious about when making transactions with him.
This can happen when, conditional on the event of being pivotal for the outcome, a voter expects a higher chance of bringing about a correct collective judgment by voting against his or her own private judgment than in line with it (Austin-Smith and Banks 1996; Feddersen and Pesendorfer 1998).
