Exact(2)
In addition, a control score was calculated by adding up the number of correct responses in the gender attribution task.
Participants with a demand score exceeding the 75th percentile were classified as exposed to high demands, and participants with a control score below the 25th percentile were classified as having low control.
Similar(58)
A Total score for all 9 skills was calculated for each participant, along with an object control score, and a locomotor score.
From this sample, they assigned some 25,000 people a job control score (from 1 to 4) based on their past job titles.
In order to derive a high-quality human interactome (the Inweb), we 1) combined several large scale protein-protein interaction databases, 2) inferred protein-protein interactions from model organisms, and 3) defined a quality control score for each interaction.
High job demands were defined as a job-demand score greater than the median and low job control as a job control score lower than the median.
High demands were defined as having a job demands score higher than the study specific median score and low job control was defined as having a job control score lower than the study specific median score.
We defined high job demands as having a job demand score that was greater than the study-specific median score; similarly, we defined low job control as having a job control score that was lower than the study-specific median score.
The following quote was expressed by a 39 year-old participant who had a high perceived control score and a low perception of risk score: ""I just [know] the way my body responds to things.
(Participant 1)" The following quote from a 44 year-old participant who had both a low perceived risk score and a low perceived control score describes this approach.
This set of penalties was optimized to allow a correct scoring of a positive control (a visibly highly similar pair of curves) and negative control (a visibly highly dissimilar pair of curves), i.e., a lower positive control score.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com