Some sets of effect and exposure biomarkers showed, in a bivariate regression plot, contrasting correlations for different ranges of exposure or effect.
The correlation patterns between the wind fields and the time coefficients of EOF1 for C5 and C6 also showed such a contrast in correlation (figure not shown).
*Two-related samples test ¤ Cohen's d is the between group effect size In contrast, HADS-A showed a correlation of 0.75 and an effects size of 0.80, and the corresponding findings for HADS-D were 0.79 and 0.67, respectively.
We describe a family of four conceptually related correlation indices: the alerting correlation, the contrast correlation, the effect-size con-elation, and the BESD (binomial effect-size display) correlation.
GLCM: Contrast, Correlation, Energy, Homogeneity.
In contrast, correlation between ex vivo BL and liver weight remained high throughout the study period (R(2) = 0.94).
In contrast, a correlation coefficient is a measure of the degree of association between two quantities; it does not measure how closely they agree.
In contrast, a correlation between H-3 and H-11 was observed in a NOESY analysis of compound A (Fig. 5).
In contrast, a correlation was clearly apparent between cell transformation and the moment of the heat shock.
By contrast, a correlation of −1 will be obtained if and only if the two graphs are completely mirrored, i.e. all edges in y1 do not exist in y2 and vice versa.
In contrast, a correlation coefficient > 0.95 denotes no statistical difference between both side histograms, meaning that the tumor might be located in the middle of the brain hemisphere.
