The phrase "a consistent standard for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing criteria or benchmarks that are reliable and uniform across different contexts or applications.
Example: "The organization aims to establish a consistent standard for evaluating employee performance across all departments."
Alternatives: "a uniform criterion for" or "a reliable benchmark for".
But there is an ocean of difference between making jams, chutneys and relishes for domestic consumption and making them to a consistent standard for sale.
The bishops could approve a consistent standard for such cases at the meeting, including restrictions on former bishops' permission to lead Mass and other services.
For that to happen, the industry would need to agree, and abide by, a consistent standard for entry to the profession – accredited independently by the NCTJ or others – and invest in a recognised programme of continuous personal development for editorial staff.
Additionally, Education Department staff wrote that Acics did not provide documentation showing that it had ensured that measurements of student achievement rates were rigorous, or that it had a consistent standard for determining when to alert the Education Department to fraud and abuse.
The school board is expected to vote to establish "a consistent standard for required instructional hours" for students to meet as they search for a summer school provider.
The gap between producers' claims of educational efficacy and a consistent standard for assessing those claims, especially for preschool media, is today's primary battleground in children's media.
Under current law, 401(k) providers, such as mutual fund families or insurance companies, are not held to any consistent standard for disclosing fees.
This lack of a consistent standard and the intense demand for donor organs for transplantation have promoted the evolution of a particular type of organ procurement technique known as 'donation after cardiac death' (DCD) that relies solely on the cessation of cardio-respiratory function without reference to neurological function.
The validity of the calculations was dependent on the use of a consistent standard, making a universal reference essential for the cross-sample comparison.
We argue that recent advances should be seen as part of a broader shift towards easier sharing of the code and data both between researchers and with wider publics, and encourage practitioners and publishers to work toward a higher and more consistent standard for the graphical display of sociological insights.
In the literature, there is no consistent standard for the minimum sample size of ARIMA models.
