The phrase "a consistent ranking" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the reliability or stability of a ranking system or list over time.
Example: "The survey results showed a consistent ranking of the top five universities across multiple years."
Alternatives: "a stable ranking" or "a reliable ranking".
We observe that a consistent ranking of each action item across all demographic subcategories is hard to achieve.
Pfaff, A., Robalino, J., Sandoval, C. & Herrera, D. Protected area types, strategies and impacts in Brazil's Amazon: public protected area strategies do not yield a consistent ranking of protected area types by impact.
In a restrictive definition, however, social choice is considered to deal with the problem of synthesizing heterogeneous individual preferences into a consistent ranking.
Panel B of the figure shows that utility rankings (calculated as the negative of the residuals) change more frequently than do prices and that no supermarket exhibits a consistent ranking.
A high correlation coefficient (ρ > 0.75, n = 36) resembles a consistent ranking of species independent of resource availability.
First, the curves are clearly sorted for all TM-score levels, i.e. there is a consistent ranking for all TM-score values.
Significant correlations between seasons were observed in all three years, revealing a consistent rank order of high to low concentrations among the monitoring sites within a given year.
It statistically indicates that in terms of accuracy and Macro-F1 there is no single method that always achieves a consistent rank position for different datasets, which is something similar to the well-known 'no-free lunch theorem' [16].
Because our results demonstrated the lack of a consistent rank-glucocorticoid relationship, further studies are needed on more groups to investigate individual and life history effects, such as age-dependent changes in glucocorticoid excretion.
Third, the Pearson correlation coefficient between the point estimates obtained under both methods is 0.80, which should be interpreted as comforting, as long as we use a very different dependent variable for measuring well-being and we get a quite consistent ranking.
Amsterdam struck the best balance globally, with a relatively consistent ranking in all three sub-incides.
