The phrase "a considerably larger sample than" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the size of a sample to another sample in research or statistical contexts.
Example: "In this study, we analyzed a considerably larger sample than in previous research, which allowed for more robust conclusions."
Alternatives: "a significantly larger sample compared to" or "a much larger sample than".
The analysis involved a considerably larger sample size than in existing studies on price promotions.
However, this exercise would require a considerably larger sample size than was available for the present study.
As the reviewer notes, the maximum longevity of humans is based on a considerably larger sample, compared to other species.
However, a considerably large sample size is needed if there are multiple risk haplotypes that contribute to trait variation.
The study gives an overall picture about the ANC adequacy and shows the large gap between rural and urban area using a considerably large sample and several indicators.
PIAAC provides internationally comparable data about skills of the adult populations in 33 countries.12 In each country, at least 5000 adults participated in the PIAAC assessment, providing considerably larger samples than in IALS, the predecessor of PIAAC.
We suggest that these considerations permit the use of the Human Infinium 450K array with Cynomolgus macaque tissues, an approach that should, among other possibilities, enable affordable and powerful studies of tissue specificity in a complex, non-human primate model with considerably larger sample sizes than would be afforded by sequencing protocols.
Two potential explanations for limited overlap are the fact that technologies and genome annotations have changed (our earlier study used the Serial analysis of gene expression [SAGE] as opposed to microarrays) and sample size (our current study has considerably larger sample size than previous publications).
Large biobanks and general population cohorts offer a great opportunity to perform genetic epidemiological association studies with considerably larger sample sizes.
The quantitative studies had considerably larger sample sizes (32 431).
