The phrase "a considerable difference for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the impact or significance of a difference in a particular context or situation.
Example: "There is a considerable difference for students who study regularly compared to those who do not."
Alternatives: "a significant difference for" or "a notable difference for".
For an orthotropic laminate with four clamped edges, no exact elasticity solution is available, and the deflection values predicted by different methods have a considerable difference each other for a small length-to-thickness ratio.
However, a considerable difference was observed for ciprofloxacin.
Within the group of novice observers there was a considerable difference in sensitivity for both review methods (Tables 3 and 4), despite the fact that all observers had undergone a similar training protocol.
However, there is evidence for a considerable difference in work time burden for hospital doctors in two European countries - Norway and Germany.
"Particularly in local elections, where a small number of votes will make a considerable difference, then the opportunities for fraud are enormous, the chances of detection very small, and a relatively modest amount of fraud will guarantee you win the election".
The absence of a considerable difference in chloride ingress for the investigated concretes, indicates either that the replacement levels of the Portland cement are too low to have a marked effect on the chemistry, or that the ingress of chloride is mainly governed by comparable physical properties i.e. porosity and degree of saturation.
We observed a considerable difference between the coverage for the common and low frequency variation.
According to the poorest to richest rate ratio for self-reported serious illnesses, there was a considerable difference among socio-economic quintiles for some acute health problems.
A considerable difference in the mean locations for persons (2.382 ± 1.039 logits) and for items (0.00 ± 1.77 logits) suggests that the quantitative MoCA is too easy for the persons who underwent testing, despite the fact that they had on average only 13 years of education.
The results showed a considerable difference between the coverage achieved for compulsory (diphtheria, tetanus, polio, hepatitis B) and for recommended (pertussis, Hib, measles, mumps ands rubella) vaccines [ 2].
