The phrase "a consequential approach" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a method or strategy that has significant effects or outcomes in a particular context.
Example: "The researchers adopted a consequential approach to evaluate the long-term impacts of their intervention on community health."
Alternatives: "an impactful approach" or "a significant approach".
A much more consequential approach would be to break up Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.
Figures using the consequential approach have a larger magnitude of variation from −36%to−13%3% for the electric heating alternative, 0 to +16% for the gas boiler alternative and −14% to +1% for the PV alternative compared to a static LCA.
The onset of expansion in the more consequential approach taken by some LCAs (cLCA), is clear in the growing use of indirect and/or consequential analyses shown in Fig. 6.
Indirect land use change in the consequential approach is one aspect, but other products or resources have other potential impacts as a consequence of a policy decision.
In this paper, we discuss the life cycle assessment as well as eco-design strategies of a bio-based product taking attributional as well as consequential approaches into account.
The authors aim to raise awareness and emphasise the need for dynamic and consequential approaches for the evaluation of climate change impacts of bioenergy systems to capture the complexity and challenges of their real emission reduction potential within a 2 °C target.
By this, the authors aim to raise awareness and emphasise the need for dynamic and consequential approaches for the evaluation of climate change impacts of bioenergy systems to capture the complexity and challenges of their real emission reduction potential within a 2 °C target.
Depending on the case and data availability, LCA applies to a consequential or attributional approach (Pawelzik et al. 2013).
A consequential-based lifecycle approach is used here to explore the carbon implications of conventional and low-energy versions of three timber multi-storey building systems.
That's a shame and — as an extraordinarily consequential election approaches — it's dangerous.
