The phrase "a consequence of the principle" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the outcomes or effects that arise from a specific principle or rule.
Example: "The increased efficiency in our processes is a consequence of the principle of continuous improvement."
Alternatives: "an outcome of the principle" or "a result of the principle".
Similar objections apply to De Morgan's laws, a consequence of the principle of the excluded third.
A consequence of the principle is that it prohibits uniformly distributed beliefs over a countably infinite set, and yet it seems at least acceptable in the absence of a reason to favor some possibilities over others to adopt such a distribution.
Since we have the effective aperture for an isotropic antenna transmitting in a free space, from a consequence of the principle of reciprocity [33, 34], we can write (A_{e,text {tag}}=G_{text {tag}} frac {lambda ^{2}}{4 pi }) for a directional antenna, where G tag is the gain measured relatively to an isotropic antenna or to a dipole antenna.
This result holds more generally, as a consequence of the principle of mathematical induction.
Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue; it is not so much a special principle as it is a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to our country's most urgent needs.... Indulgence for the royalists, cry certain men, mercy for the villains!
Rather, it is a consequence of the "anthropic principle": if our universe weren't the way it is, we wouldn't be here to observe it.
The first result is a consequence of the contraction principle.
The uniqueness of a zeroth order solution of (18) is a consequence of the comparison principle, Proposition 18, with (,psi,) replaced by (,varphi ).
Now, under conditions (8) and (10), set c ∈ R ⟶ v c ∈ C [ 0, T ], where v c is the unique solution of (7), and as a consequence of the contraction principle, this map is continuous.
While he does not directly discuss 0.999..., he shows the real number 1/3 is represented by 0.333... ...333... which is a consequence of the transfer principle.
This monotonicity, which implies that the total number of events for g = 1 is minimal, is a consequence of the parsimony principle and can be proved by straightforward algebraic manipulation (not shown).
