The phrase "a consequence of sequence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an outcome or result that arises from a particular order or arrangement of events or elements.
Example: "The delay in the project was a consequence of sequence, as each phase depended on the completion of the previous one."
Alternatives: "an outcome of order" or "a result of arrangement".
Implicit in this simplification is a crucial assumption that has never been critically evaluated in a broad context: Detailed mechanisms of protein folding are not biased by nonnative contacts, typically argued to be a consequence of sequence design and/or topology.
Gene silencing as a consequence of sequence duplications is particularly prevalent among plant species.
Alternatively, differences between DNase I, Benzonase and Cyanase can be a consequence of sequence specificity for DNA recognition and cleavage by each of the endonucleases.
Nevertheless, many sequence variants were detected reasonably well in the current study, suggesting that degradation of mRNA occurred rarely, if at all, as a consequence of sequence alterations.
While this approach reduces the complexity of the pool of sequences hybridized to the microarray, differences in signal intensity that arise as a consequence of sequence variation among genotypes can be confounded with differences in transcript abundance.
Five of the 21 markers screened during primer development were thus rejected, and their failure to cross-amplify is likely a consequence of sequence divergence between these two lineages in the primer binding sites.
By analogy with the quinolones, this may reflect a consequence of sequence-selective DNA cleavage by topoisomerase II in the context of the drug/DNA/enzyme complex [40], [45].
These mutations may have arisen due to strain passaging or a consequence of sequencing errors from the original sequencing but the observation of these mutations clustering at loci suggests due to passaging.
This is a higher number of OTUs than previously reported to be associated with human gut [ 26, 29- 32], but we suspected this to be a consequence of sequencing error combined with the deep level of coverage [ 33].
Given that the high values of the correlation coefficients are a consequence of sequences of guanines in the probe sequence, two questions that immediately arise are 'Is the location within the probe of the consecutive run of guanines relevant?' and 'Is the number of consecutive guanines relevant?'.
158 These genes are believed to be 1) a consequence of sequencing errors and/or reflect the inaccuracy of gene prediction tools, or 2) truly novel genes that have no sequence or function similarity to known genes and may share higher order similarity in the form of protein folds.
