The phrase "a consequence of past" is not correct in English.
It should be "a consequence of the past." You can use it when discussing the effects or results that arise from historical events or actions.
Example: "The economic downturn is a consequence of the past decisions made by the government."
Alternatives: "result of history" or "outcome of previous events."
In lung cancer – which kills more Britons than any other form of cancer – mortality will fall among men but keep on rising among women, as a consequence of past changes in the gender balance of smokers.
October 18, 1774 Langendorf, Germany June 11 , 1829South Africa Adolf Müllner, in full Amadeus Gottfried Adolf Müllner (born Oct. 18, 1774, Langendorf, near Weissenfels, Saxony [Germany] died June 11 , 1829 Weissenfels, Prussia), German playwright, one of the so-called fate dramatists, who wrote plays in which people perish as a consequence of past behaviour.
This is a consequence of past recklessness, since supporters have lost faith in those running the club.
Note that while sense, object, and conscious apprehension come together as a consequence of past habituations and other conditioning factors, the ensuing cognitive awareness appears to both sustain and be sustained by these factors.
Local genotypes are to a certain extent transient, being a consequence of past historical genetic patterns.
Estimates of current occupational cancer deaths and registrations are a consequence of past exposures to hazardous agents.
Because the current trait distribution of a population is often in large part a consequence of its past selective regime, understanding past selection may help predict which species or populations are likely to be especially vulnerable or resistant to particular environmental changes, and prioritize limited conservation resources accordingly.
You exploited your blame-the-past-administration card when you stated that Assad's atrocious chemical attack is "a consequence of the past administration's weakness and irresolution".
He also described the attack as a "consequence of the past Administration's weakness and irresolution".
Not knowing who, ultimately, will lose as a consequence of our past excesses helps explain America's current strife.
The climate change now emerging is predominantly a consequence of the past activities of fewer than 3 billion people; not the current activities of 7 billion of us.
