The phrase "a consequence of methodological" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the results or outcomes that arise from a specific methodology or approach in research or analysis.
Example: "The discrepancies in the data were found to be a consequence of methodological differences between the two studies."
Alternatives: "an outcome of methodological" or "a result of methodological".
This wide range is likely a consequence of methodological differences, as has been noted in reviews of both community adolescent (Muehlenkamp, Claes, Havertape, & Plener, 2012) and adult forensic (Dixon-Gordon, 2011) studies.
It will have to be clarified, whether this is due to differences in study design or a consequence of methodological aspects.
This difference in contra-indicated prescription trends may be a consequence of methodological differences between our study and the UK study.
The heterogeneity described in the meta-analysis is, however, a consequence of methodological as well as clinical differences between the studies.
This study was initiated as a consequence of methodological problems related to a cross-cultural survey involving cancer wards at three large hospitals in Copenhagen 2007-2009.
Recently, additional epidemiological observations confirmed the previous studies, but findings with low risk association estimates could be a consequence of methodological approaches [ 19– 24].
As a consequence of ongoing methodological advancement, a growing number of new oncogenes and tumor suppressors have been identified [9].
This alternative, yet complementary, prediction capability is a consequence of the methodological differences exhibited by the approaches investigated here.
On the other hand large differences in the rates of remission and recovery emerge across studies as a consequence of different methodological procedures [ 27, 28] and/or different outcome criteria [ 29, 30].
On its first reading, ontological naturalism in the philosophy of mathematics is a straightforward consequence of methodological scientific naturalism.
The relatively limited research in this area is a direct consequence of methodological and conceptual challenges for developing OHRQoL measures for very young children.
