The phrase "a consequence of differences in the" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the results or effects that arise from varying factors or conditions in a particular context.
Example: "The study revealed that the observed outcomes were a consequence of differences in the participants' backgrounds."
Alternatives: "a result of variations in the" or "an outcome of disparities in the".
We therefore speculate that the different crystalline films are a consequence of differences in the kinetics of molecules on the two different wetting monolayer structures.
However, it is generally accepted that this is due to expression in different tissues or in the same tissue but at different times rather than being a consequence of differences in the potency or mechanism of action of the different anti-apoptotic proteins.
Results between studies may vary as a consequence of differences in the PS of enrolled patients, inclusion of different proportions of relapsed patients exposed to prior pelvic radiotherapy, and drug doses.
Evident differences in dominant NLAB were found between C1 and C2 samples; this could be a consequence of differences in the environmental conditions (i.e., temperature, water, and maize provenance) and in the evolution of dough pH; this parameter has a strong and decisive influence on the control and selection of bacteria.
This "missing" transcript phenomenon is undoubtedly a consequence of differences in the location and presence/absence of the restriction enzyme recognition site in the transcript.
This finding is important because it indicates that variations of tuning selectivity across the orientation map do not necessarily have to arise as a consequence of differences in the local feedback signal within the cortex, which has been a key assumption in interpreting some experimental data [93], [95], [96].
This is a consequence of differences in ancestral population sizes and the time between speciation events.
This could in part be a consequence of differences in study design.
The discrepancies may be a consequence of the differences in the experimental setups.
This behavior is a consequence of the difference in the surface morphology of the two sets of nanoparticles.
This principle is ultimately a consequence of the differences in function of the state and federal judicial systems.
