Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
A concordance coefficient with value of 1 indicates a perfect agreement, −1 indicates a perfect disagreement, and 0 indicates no agreement.
The W Kendall test scored a concordance coefficient of 0.81 (p < 0.01).
Considering the investigative nature of the study design and because the number of pleural plaques and nodules was not known initially, a sample size estimation was not proposed a priori even though a concordance coefficient κ between 0.40 and 0.90 was expected between FBP and Veo images.
Similar(57)
Immunohistochemical staining data and sHE4 levels showed a low concordance coefficient in paired tumour samples.
Five symptoms gave a Kappa concordance coefficient value above 0.1, thus allowing construction of the COPD Symptoms Index.
Comparing the MR and PET template-based spatial normalization methods, there was a high degree of concordance between the measured tissue concentrations in the caudate nucleus and the putamen in MNI space with a Lin's concordance coefficient (ρc) of 0.87 including an upper one-sided 95% confidence interval of ρc = 0.93 and a lower one-sided 95% confidence interval of ρc = 0.79 [15].
The striatal-to-cerebellar ratio (SCR) of 11C-raclopride uptake obtained using the PET template was in good agreement with the MRI-based image processing method, yielding a Lin's concordance coefficient of 0.87.
Further comparison of the leads at which the phases originated in the FFT-based phase analysis with those in the Hilbert-base analysis revealed a highly significant concordance (ƙ concordance coefficient 0.741 [95% confidence interval, 0.497 0.938]), mainly when the origin was at V1 V2 or V5-V6.
b Patient without myocardial flow defects Fig. 4 Lin's concordance coefficient graphs for (a) segmental and b regional analyses between RP B, E, H, and RP A (standard) in all patients.
A concordance correlation coefficient value of 0.04 was found for the DSM approach, but higher for the MPS approach (0.16).
Predicted monthly herbage growth rates had a line bias of 2%, a proportion of RMSPE due to random error of 96%, and a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.87.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com