Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
For example, using the Japanese lamprey (Lethenteron japonicum) genome assembly, BUSCO referring to its original vertebrate gene set showed a completeness score of only 21%%.
Many questions were structured in such a way that they would receive a completeness score of '3' if they had a scope score of '1' (e.g. What is the bioavailability of oral levofloxacin? 99%).
Similar(58)
A report with a vigiGrade completeness score of 0.90 or more may lack information on only one of the following information items: type of report, type of notifier, outcome, or free text description; all other items described above must be documented.
An integrated assembly is expected to have a completeness score equal to or larger than those of any individual assemblies.
With a maximum possible completeness score of thirteen, most practitioners voted together on placing more on the problem list than less.
The completeness score of a module is the percentage of the protein families of a module that occurred in a specific genome or taxonomic bin.
The completeness score of the automatic method was compared with a visual consensus read by three radiologists using boxplots, rank sum tests and ROC analysis.
For example, the completeness score of 5TNS, which has three sequence elements (i.e., a poly(T) tail, XhoI site, and VF2), is higher than 5TNS-1 and 5TNS-2, each of which have only two sequence elements.
It is noted that the completeness score of Assembly 13 based on the CVG almost reached 100%%, demonstrating that low completeness scores of the CVG (Fig. 3c) is not caused by the absence of the expression of orthologs in transcriptomes.
Comparing with 5TNS, 5TNS-1 and 5TNS-2, the completeness score of 5TNS-3 is the lowest one because it only has one sequence element.
For each classified sample, we provide several details (for example, name and phylum), as well as the genome-specific module weight (completeness score) of the respective consensus module.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com